Jim McLeod vs. Paul Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Paul Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Paul Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (.517 vs .485) and slugging (.273 vs .237). By the career numbers, Paul Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Paul Smith
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.576
0.576
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
11
146.67
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.045
0.045
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.178
0.178
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.471
0.471
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
3.78
50.46
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
5.63
5.63
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.13
0.13
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Paul Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Paul Smith
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Paul Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Paul Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100