Jim McLeod vs. Leo Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Leo Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Leo Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (.533 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.283 vs .248). Jim McLeod had the advantage in batting average (.203 vs .188). By the career numbers, Leo Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Leo Smith
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.569
0.569
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.063
0.063
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.19
0.19
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.484
0.484
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
10.28
48.59
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
4.72
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Leo Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Leo Smith
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
1.07
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
181
5.54
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.76
94.76
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442
Leo Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.171
5.171