Jim McLeod vs. Ed Silch — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Silch posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McLeod. Ed Silch posted stronger numbers in OPS (.681 vs .485) and on-base percentage (.327 vs .248). By the career numbers, Ed Silch had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Ed Silch
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.327
0.327
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.354
0.354
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.714
0.714
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
6.77
78.17
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
6.5
6.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
3
6.23
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
4
46.15
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
66.67
66.67
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Ed Silch
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Ed Silch
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.19
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Ed Silch
Career
Per 9 Innings
86.96
86.96
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442
Ed Silch
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.429
1.429