Jim McLeod vs. Dave Short — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Dave Short. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .377) and slugging (.237 vs .091). Dave Short had the advantage in on-base percentage (.286 vs .248). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Dave Short
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
0.464
0.464
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
0.151
0.151
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
0.53
22.72
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
4.67
4.67
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.47
0.47
Dave Short
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Dave Short
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Dave Short
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Dave Short
Career
Per 9 Innings
80