Jim McLeod vs. Warren Shanabrook — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Warren Shanabrook. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Warren Shanabrook
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
92
191
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
1
200
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.19
-38.03
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
7
14.53
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
1
200
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Warren Shanabrook
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
Warren Shanabrook
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0