Jim McLeod vs. Nick Scharf — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim McLeod and Nick Scharf are closely matched on the surface stats. Nick Scharf posted stronger numbers in OPS (.534 vs .485) and slugging (.327 vs .237). Jim McLeod had the advantage in on-base percentage (.248 vs .208). By the career numbers, Nick Scharf had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Nick Scharf
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
53
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
0.538
0.538
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
11
124.53
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
0.208
0.208
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
0.327
0.327
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
0.135
0.135
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
3.56
40.29
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Nick Scharf
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
0.99
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 9 Innings
26
1.98
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Nick Scharf
Career
Per 9 Innings
70.27
70.27