Jim McLeod vs. John Sanderson — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Jim McLeod and John Sanderson are closely matched on the surface stats. John Sanderson posted stronger numbers in on-base percentage (.267 vs .248) and batting average (.214 vs .203). Jim McLeod had the advantage in slugging (.237 vs .214). By the career numbers, John Sanderson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and John Sanderson
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
30
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
8
160
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
2.06
41.21
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
John Sanderson
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and John Sanderson
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
John Sanderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
9
1.09
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
John Sanderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
4.26
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
John Sanderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
3.65
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
John Sanderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
85.71
85.71
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442
John Sanderson
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.333
3.333