Jim McLeod vs. Unknown Proctor — Career Comparison
A full statistical comparison isn't possible here, but the available career numbers offer some indication. Unknown Proctor had the edge in on-base percentage (1.000 vs .248). By the career numbers, Unknown Proctor had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Unknown Proctor
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
70
145.33
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
16.16
33.56
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.34
205.73
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Unknown Proctor
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Unknown Proctor
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
3.86