Jim McLeod vs. Matthew Porter — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Matthew Porter. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .250) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .083). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Matthew Porter
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
12
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.148
0.148
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
15.2
31.55
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
9.02
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.034
0.034
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.079
0.079
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
4
8.3
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Matthew Porter
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.04
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
229
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
2.77
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
2.08
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Matthew Porter
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
75