Jim McLeod vs. Rusty Payne — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McLeod posted the stronger offensive profile against Rusty Payne. Jim McLeod posted stronger numbers in OPS (.485 vs .229) and on-base percentage (.248 vs .167). By the career numbers, Jim McLeod had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McLeod and Rusty Payne
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
289
600
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
19
600
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.063
0.063
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.516
0.516
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.237
0.237
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.063
0.063
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.171
0.171
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 600 PA
9.63
9.63
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Jim McLeod and Rusty Payne
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1.29
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
210
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
2.14
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.7
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim McLeod
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.442
Rusty Payne
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.667
1.667