Ed McLane vs. Tim Thompson — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tim Thompson posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McLane. Tim Thompson posted stronger numbers in OPS (.641 vs .333) and slugging (.338 vs .000). Ed McLane had the advantage in on-base percentage (.333 vs .302). By the career numbers, Tim Thompson had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed McLane and Tim Thompson
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.644
0.644
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.05
10.43
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 600 PA
52.51
56.26
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.293
0.293
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.217
0.217
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 600 PA
0.538
0.538
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.12
24.28
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 600 PA
53.64
57.48
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 600 PA
10.77
10.77
Fielding Stats for Ed McLane and Tim Thompson
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
137
1.1
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
126
1.01
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
9
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
1125.2
9
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
696
5.56
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
686
5.48
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
33.33
33.33
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
98.56
98.56
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.007
5.007
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
91.97
91.97
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0
Tim Thompson
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
0.27