Ed McLane vs. Gracie Pierce — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Gracie Pierce posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McLane. Gracie Pierce posted stronger numbers in OPS (.423 vs .333) and slugging (.218 vs .000). Ed McLane had the advantage in on-base percentage (.333 vs .205). By the career numbers, Gracie Pierce had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed McLane and Gracie Pierce
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 600 PA
312
600
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.428
0.428
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.05
10.43
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 600 PA
13.26
25.49
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.205
0.205
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.15
0.15
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.147
0.147
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 600 PA
0.29
0.29
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
0.12
24.28
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 600 PA
13.33
25.64
Ed McLane
Career
Per 600 PA
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 600 PA
34.67
34.67
Fielding Stats for Ed McLane and Gracie Pierce
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 9 Innings
87
1.14
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
27
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 9 Innings
2058
27
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 9 Innings
461
6.05
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 9 Innings
374
4.91
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
33.33
33.33
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 9 Innings
81.13
81.13
Ed McLane
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Gracie Pierce
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.299
4.299