Jim McKnight vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Hal Quick posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McKnight. Hal Quick posted stronger numbers in OPS (.547 vs .500) and on-base percentage (.279 vs .247). By the career numbers, Hal Quick had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McKnight and Hal Quick
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
63
406.45
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.231
0.231
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.505
0.505
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.048
0.048
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
23
148.39
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.247
0.247
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.253
0.253
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.022
0.022
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.024
0.024
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
4.78
30.84
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
3.12
43.54
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
6.64
6.64
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
43
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 600 PA
5
32.26
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
27.91
Fielding Stats for Jim McKnight and Hal Quick
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 9 Innings
18
1.64
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 9 Innings
39
3.55
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
51
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.86
92.86
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73
Jim McKnight
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.167
2.167
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.1