Ed McKenna vs. Francis Nance — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed McKenna posted the stronger offensive profile against Francis Nance. Ed McKenna posted stronger numbers in OPS (.411 vs .100) and on-base percentage (.215 vs .100). By the career numbers, Ed McKenna had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed McKenna and Francis Nance
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
32
158.68
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
4
218.18
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
121
600
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
11
600
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.422
0.422
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
4.77
23.65
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.01
0.66
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
26
128.93
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
1
54.55
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.146
0.146
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.045
0.045
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 600 PA
0.284
0.284
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Fielding Stats for Ed McKenna and Francis Nance
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
40
1.41
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.16
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
765
27
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
93
27
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
255
9
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
31
9
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
205
7.24
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
7.26
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
170
6
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
6.97
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
82.93
82.93
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
96
Ed McKenna
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.25
4.25
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
6