John McKelvey vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against John McKelvey. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .504) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .249). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John McKelvey and Jim Smith
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
193
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.521
0.521
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.093
0.093
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
11.64
36.2
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.249
0.249
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.255
0.255
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.027
0.027
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.176
0.176
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
0.381
0.381
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
13.46
41.84
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
24.13
24.13
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
John McKelvey
Career
Per 600 PA
1
3.11
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for John McKelvey and Jim Smith
John McKelvey
Career
Per 9 Innings
44
0.97
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
John McKelvey
Career
Per 9 Innings
1230
27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
27
John McKelvey
Career
Per 9 Innings
82
1.8
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
John McKelvey
Career
Per 9 Innings
53
1.16
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
John McKelvey
Career
Per 9 Innings
64.63
64.63
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
John McKelvey
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.205
1.205
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5