Dave McKay vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Dave McKay. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .580) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .267). Dave McKay had the advantage in home run production (21 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Dave McKay and Jim Smith
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
0.229
0.229
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
0.606
0.606
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
156.58
45.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
0.313
0.313
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
0.085
0.085
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
0.198
0.198
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
160.99
46.31
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Dave McKay
Career
Per 600 PA
49
14.09
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Dave McKay and Jim Smith
Dave McKay
Career
Per 9 Innings
653
1.19
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Dave McKay
Career
Per 9 Innings
531
0.97
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Dave McKay
Career
Per 9 Innings
2597
4.75
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Dave McKay
Career
Per 9 Innings
2511
4.59
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Dave McKay
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.69
96.69
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Dave McKay
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.845
3.845
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Dave McKay
Career
Per 9 Innings
81.32
81.32
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100