Otto McIvor vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Otto McIvor. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .672) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .333). Otto McIvor had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Otto McIvor and Jim Smith
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.226
0.226
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.694
0.694
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.339
0.339
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.113
0.113
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
0.646
0.646
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 600 PA
8.38
69.86
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Otto McIvor and Jim Smith
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 9 Innings
17
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Otto McIvor
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.59
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100