Jim McHale vs. Dixie Parker — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McHale posted the stronger offensive profile against Dixie Parker. Jim McHale posted stronger numbers in OPS (.591 vs .400) and on-base percentage (.278 vs .200). By the career numbers, Jim McHale had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McHale and Dixie Parker
Jim McHale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.224
0.224
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McHale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.666
0.666
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim McHale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McHale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.313
0.313
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim McHale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Jim McHale
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim McHale
Career
Per 600 PA
7.36
58.13
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
21.95
Jim McHale
Career
Per 600 PA
5.85
5.85
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 600 PA
5
5
Fielding Stats for Jim McHale and Dixie Parker
Jim McHale
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
1.07
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
Jim McHale
Career
Per 9 Innings
32
1.8
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
Jim McHale
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.97
96.97
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
50
Jim McHale
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.684
1.684
Dixie Parker
Career
Per 9 Innings
0.5