Ambrose McGann vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Ambrose McGann. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .769) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .358). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ambrose McGann and Jim Smith
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
82
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
0.288
0.288
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
0.833
0.833
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
12.46
91.15
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
0.358
0.358
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
0.411
0.411
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
0.123
0.123
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
0.264
0.264
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
0.846
0.846
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
12.94
94.72
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 600 PA
13.67
13.67
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Ambrose McGann and Jim Smith
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 9 Innings
19
1.14
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 9 Innings
450
27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
27
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 9 Innings
86
5.16
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 9 Innings
74
4.44
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 9 Innings
86.05
86.05
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ambrose McGann
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.895
3.895
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5