John McFarlin vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against John McFarlin. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .400) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .200). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for John McFarlin and Jim Smith
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.4
0.4
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.36
21.64
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
John McFarlin
Career
Per 600 PA
0.39
23.33
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for John McFarlin and Jim Smith
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.04
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
34
11.77
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
33
11.42
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.06
97.06
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
John McFarlin
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100