Howie McFarland vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Howie McFarland. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .182) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .091). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Howie McFarland and Jim Smith
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
11
600
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
4
600
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.182
0.182
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.064
0.064
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.091
0.091
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
3.67
3.67
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 600 PA
1
54.55
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Howie McFarland and Jim Smith
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Howie McFarland
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100