Jim McDonnell vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Hal Quick posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McDonnell. Hal Quick posted stronger numbers in OPS (.547 vs .503) and on-base percentage (.279 vs .272). By the career numbers, Hal Quick had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McDonnell and Hal Quick
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
50
285.71
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
105
600
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
600
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.533
0.533
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
2
11.43
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
1
13.95
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
22
125.71
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
11
153.49
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.232
0.232
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.021
0.021
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.024
0.024
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.38
0.38
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.93
33.89
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
3.12
43.54
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
13.13
13.13
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
43
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
22.86
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
27.91
Fielding Stats for Jim McDonnell and Hal Quick
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
37
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.33
Hal Quick
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.73