Jim McDonnell vs. Francis Nance — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McDonnell posted the stronger offensive profile against Francis Nance. Jim McDonnell posted stronger numbers in OPS (.503 vs .100) and on-base percentage (.272 vs .100). By the career numbers, Jim McDonnell had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McDonnell and Francis Nance
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
50
285.71
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
4
218.18
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
105
600
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
11
600
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.533
0.533
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.1
29.15
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.01
0.66
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
28
160
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
1
54.55
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.272
0.272
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.045
0.045
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
0.38
0.38
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
5.93
33.89
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.55
-30.01
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
13.13
13.13
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
2
11.43
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
1
54.55
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 600 PA
4
22.86
Francis Nance
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McDonnell and Francis Nance
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
37
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.16
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
150
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
7.26
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
143
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
24
6.97
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.33
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
96
96
Jim McDonnell
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.865
Francis Nance
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
6