Jim McDonald vs. Ed Sherling — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Sherling posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McDonald. Ed Sherling posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.500 vs .319) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .156). By the career numbers, Ed Sherling had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McDonald and Ed Sherling
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
45
161.68
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
4
1200
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
167
600
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
0.146
0.146
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
0.323
0.323
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
4.04
14.52
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.71
212.28
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
0.156
0.156
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
0.018
0.018
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.475
0.475
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
0.98
3.52
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.68
203.37
Jim McDonald
Career
Per 600 PA
41.75
41.75
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA