Ed McDonough vs. Jim Roxburgh — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Roxburgh posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McDonough. Jim Roxburgh posted stronger numbers in OPS (.607 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.357 vs .100). By the career numbers, Jim Roxburgh had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed McDonough and Jim Roxburgh
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
600
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.643
0.643
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
5.34
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
1.21
51.67
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.07
0.07
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.223
0.223
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.556
0.556
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.273
0.273
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
14
14
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ed McDonough and Jim Roxburgh
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.14
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.5
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
63
27
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
90
27
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
9
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
9
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
8.4
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
6.9
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
82.14
82.14
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.8
2.8
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
4.6
4.6
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
Jim Roxburgh
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0