Ed McDonough vs. Frank Ringo — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Frank Ringo posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McDonough. Frank Ringo posted stronger numbers in OPS (.466 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.215 vs .100). By the career numbers, Frank Ringo had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed McDonough and Frank Ringo
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
6
360
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
139
160.08
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
521
600
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.192
0.192
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.473
0.473
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.09
5.34
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
27.52
31.69
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.215
0.215
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.251
0.251
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.07
0.07
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.16
0.16
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.347
0.347
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 600 PA
7.44
7.44
Fielding Stats for Ed McDonough and Frank Ringo
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.14
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 9 Innings
142
1.14
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
63
27
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 9 Innings
3366
27
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
9
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 9 Innings
1122
9
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 9 Innings
875
7.02
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 9 Innings
735
5.9
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 9 Innings
84
84
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.8
2.8
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.176
5.176
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
Frank Ringo
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0