Ed McDonough vs. Jim Reilly — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Reilly posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McDonough. Jim Reilly posted stronger numbers in OPS (.464 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.214 vs .100). By the career numbers, Jim Reilly had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed McDonough and Jim Reilly
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 600 PA
42
600
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 600 PA
0.175
0.175
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 600 PA
0.476
0.476
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.07
0.07
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 600 PA
0.159
0.159
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 600 PA
0.364
0.364
Fielding Stats for Ed McDonough and Jim Reilly
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.14
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
0.94
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 9 Innings
73
6.84
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 9 Innings
62
5.81
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 9 Innings
84.93
84.93
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.8
2.8
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 9 Innings
6.2
6.2
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
Jim Reilly
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0