Ed McDonough vs. Earl Rapp — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earl Rapp posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed McDonough. Earl Rapp posted stronger numbers in OPS (.694 vs .200) and on-base percentage (.325 vs .100). By the career numbers, Earl Rapp had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed McDonough and Earl Rapp
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 600 PA
306
600
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.262
0.262
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.2
0.2
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.709
0.709
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.325
0.325
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.369
0.369
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.07
0.07
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.238
0.238
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.111
0.111
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 600 PA
0.618
0.618
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 600 PA
7.46
7.46
Fielding Stats for Ed McDonough and Earl Rapp
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.14
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
55
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.3
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.8
2.8
Earl Rapp
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.964