Ed McDonough vs. Fancy O'Neil — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed McDonough posted the stronger offensive profile against Fancy O'Neil. Ed McDonough posted stronger numbers in OPS (.200 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.100 vs .000). By the career numbers, Ed McDonough had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed McDonough and Fancy O'Neil
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
600
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0.07
0.07
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.33
-19.83
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
-0.31
-62.13
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
10
10
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
3
3
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Ed McDonough and Fancy O'Neil
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
2.14
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
63
27
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
27
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
21
9
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
9
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
6
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.8
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.8
2.8
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
40
40
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Ed McDonough
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
0.86
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
0
0