Jim McCurine vs. Fancy O'Neil — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim McCurine posted the stronger offensive profile against Fancy O'Neil. Jim McCurine posted stronger numbers in OPS (.588 vs .000) and on-base percentage (.282 vs .000). By the career numbers, Jim McCurine had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McCurine and Fancy O'Neil
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 600 PA
43
160.25
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
1
200
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 600 PA
161
600
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
3
600
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 600 PA
0.282
0.282
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Jim McCurine and Fancy O'Neil
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
39
1.12
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
35
1
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
0.9
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
943
27
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
30
27
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
314.1
9
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
9
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
1.72
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
2.7
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
56
1.6
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
1.8
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
93.33
93.33
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
66.67
66.67
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.436
1.436
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
2
2
Jim McCurine
Career
Per 9 Innings
89.74
89.74
Fancy O'Neil
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100