Pete McClanahan vs. Ken Williams — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Pete McClanahan and Ken Williams are closely matched on the surface stats. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .924) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .393). Ken Williams had the advantage in slugging (.530 vs .500). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete McClanahan and Ken Williams
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
1397
149.25
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
5616
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.319
0.319
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.924
0.924
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
199
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
1003.31
107.19
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
2579
275.53
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
2146
229.27
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.393
0.393
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.53
0.53
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.924
0.924
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.31
0.31
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0.974
0.974
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
1577
168.48
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
1040.42
111.16
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
19.57
19.57
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ken Williams
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0