Pete McClanahan vs. Carl Sumner — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete McClanahan posted the stronger offensive profile against Carl Sumner. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .762) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .382). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete McClanahan and Carl Sumner
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
16
282.35
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
34
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.276
0.276
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.779
0.779
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
199
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
4.78
84.35
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
11
194.12
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
13
229.41
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.382
0.382
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.379
0.379
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.762
0.762
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
0.762
0.762
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
9
158.82
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
5.08
89.68
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
5.67
5.67
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Carl Sumner
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0