Pete McClanahan vs. Hal Quick — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete McClanahan posted the stronger offensive profile against Hal Quick. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .547) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .279). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete McClanahan and Hal Quick
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
43
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.244
0.244
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.577
0.577
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
12
167.44
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.279
0.279
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.268
0.268
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.193
0.193
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
0.424
0.424
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
3.12
43.54
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Hal Quick
Career
Per 600 PA
2
27.91