Pete McClanahan vs. Ed Putman — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete McClanahan posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Putman. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .683) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .316). Ed Putman had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete McClanahan and Ed Putman
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
43
326.58
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
79
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.239
0.239
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.688
0.688
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
199
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
7.71
58.53
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
25
189.87
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.317
0.317
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.366
0.366
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
0.586
0.586
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
7.73
58.7
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
4.39
4.39
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Ed Putman
Career
Per 600 PA
3
22.78