Pete McClanahan vs. Doc Prothro — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete McClanahan posted the stronger offensive profile against Doc Prothro. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .798) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .390). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete McClanahan and Doc Prothro
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
180
158.13
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
683
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
0.318
0.318
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
0.807
0.807
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
199
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
98.49
86.52
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
245
215.23
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
261
229.28
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
0.39
0.39
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
0.408
0.408
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
0.798
0.798
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
0.277
0.277
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
0.774
0.774
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
147
129.14
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
106.6
93.64
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
17.08
17.08
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Doc Prothro
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0