Pete McClanahan vs. Adam Piatt — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete McClanahan posted the stronger offensive profile against Adam Piatt. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .745) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .323). Adam Piatt had the advantage in home run production (16 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Pete McClanahan and Adam Piatt
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
212
216.33
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
588
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.757
0.757
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
199
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
72.72
74.21
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
220
224.49
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
189
192.86
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.323
0.323
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.422
0.422
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.251
0.251
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
0.699
0.699
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
111
113.27
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
72.31
73.79
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
3.95
3.95
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Adam Piatt
Career
Per 600 PA
9
9.18