Jim McCauley vs. Ed Sherling — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Ed Sherling posted the stronger offensive profile against Jim McCauley. Ed Sherling posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.500 vs .551) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .322). By the career numbers, Ed Sherling had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Jim McCauley and Ed Sherling
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
39
160.27
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
4
1200
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
146
600
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
2
600
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.189
0.189
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.607
0.607
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.174
0.174
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
11.63
47.8
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.71
212.28
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.322
0.322
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.041
0.041
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
0.202
0.202
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.475
0.475
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
12.92
53.08
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA
0.68
203.37
Jim McCauley
Career
Per 600 PA
9.73
9.73
Ed Sherling
Career
Per 600 PA