Henry McCall vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Henry McCall. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .758) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .345). Henry McCall had the advantage in home run production (2 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Henry McCall and Jim Smith
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
0.31
0.31
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
0.77
0.77
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
0.227
0.227
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
34.47
80.48
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
0.345
0.345
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
0.413
0.413
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
0.103
0.103
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
0.689
0.689
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Henry McCall
Career
Per 600 PA
39.09
91.27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Henry McCall and Jim Smith
Henry McCall
Career
Per 9 Innings
67
1.13
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Henry McCall
Career
Per 9 Innings
64
1.08
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Henry McCall
Career
Per 9 Innings
619
10.43
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Henry McCall
Career
Per 9 Innings
602
10.15
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Henry McCall
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.25
97.25
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Henry McCall
Career
Per 9 Innings
8.985
8.985
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Henry McCall
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.52
95.52
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100