William Matthews vs. Dan McFarlan — Career Comparison

Looking at the career totals, William Matthews and Dan McFarlan are fairly close on the surface numbers. William Matthews posted stronger numbers in ERA (3.24 vs 5.02) and WHIP (1.560 vs 1.654). Dan McFarlan had the advantage in home runs allowed (0.34 per nine innings vs 0.54). By the career numbers, William Matthews had the better of this comparison — though ERA and WHIP alone don't account for era, park factors, or the defenses each pitcher worked behind.