Francisco Matos vs. Pete McClanahan — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Pete McClanahan posted the stronger offensive profile against Francisco Matos. Pete McClanahan posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .552) and on-base percentage (.667 vs .267). By the career numbers, Pete McClanahan had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Francisco Matos and Pete McClanahan
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
14
280
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
7
700
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
30
600
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
6
600
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.61
0.61
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
2.1
41.92
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.99
199
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
8
160
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
8
160
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
4
400
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.267
0.267
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.552
0.552
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.167
1.167
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.191
0.191
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.425
0.425
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.455
0.455
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
2
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
0.259
0.259
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
3
60
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
2
200
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
2.37
47.43
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
1.78
178.28
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
15
15
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
Francisco Matos
Career
Per 600 PA
1
20
Pete McClanahan
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0