Henry Mateo vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Henry Mateo. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .583) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .291). Henry Mateo had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Henry Mateo and Jim Smith
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.234
0.234
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.633
0.633
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.183
0.183
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
24.19
51.84
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.289
0.289
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.292
0.292
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.058
0.058
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.203
0.203
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
0.542
0.542
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 600 PA
25.27
54.15
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Henry Mateo and Jim Smith
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 9 Innings
79
1.9
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 9 Innings
32
0.77
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 9 Innings
223
5.36
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 9 Innings
211
5.07
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 9 Innings
94.62
94.62
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 9 Innings
2.671
2.671
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Henry Mateo
Career
Per 9 Innings
40.51
40.51
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100