Tom Marsh vs. Ed Silch — Career Comparison
Looking at the career totals, Tom Marsh and Ed Silch are closely matched on the surface stats. Ed Silch posted stronger numbers in OPS (.681 vs .631) and on-base percentage (.327 vs .266). Tom Marsh had the advantage in slugging (.365 vs .354). By the career numbers, Ed Silch had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Tom Marsh and Ed Silch
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.246
0.246
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.271
0.271
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.642
0.642
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.75
0.75
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.258
0.258
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.266
0.266
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.327
0.327
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.365
0.365
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.354
0.354
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.083
0.083
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.211
0.211
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.236
0.236
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.513
0.513
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.714
0.714
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
5.43
5.43
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
6.5
6.5
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 600 PA
0.14
0.14
Ed Silch
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Fielding Stats for Tom Marsh and Ed Silch
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
71
1.24
Ed Silch
Career
Per 9 Innings
14
1.19
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
126
2.19
Ed Silch
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
1.95
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
120
2.09
Ed Silch
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
1.7
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
95.24
95.24
Ed Silch
Career
Per 9 Innings
86.96
86.96
Tom Marsh
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.69
1.69
Ed Silch
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.429
1.429