Eddie Malone vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Eddie Malone. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .684) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .361). Eddie Malone had the advantage in home run production (1 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Eddie Malone and Jim Smith
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.257
0.257
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.713
0.713
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.194
0.194
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
27.9
59.58
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.361
0.361
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.324
0.324
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.066
0.066
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.243
0.243
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
0.623
0.623
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
31.51
67.27
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
10.41
10.41
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 600 PA
11
23.49
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0
0
Fielding Stats for Eddie Malone and Jim Smith
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 9 Innings
72
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 9 Innings
297
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Eddie Malone
Career
Per 9 Innings
99.33
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100