Ed Madjeski vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Ed Madjeski. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .595) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .274). Ed Madjeski had the advantage in home run production (5 career HR at a higher rate). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Ed Madjeski and Jim Smith
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
0.609
0.609
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
0.224
0.224
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1
1
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
43.46
51.33
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
0.274
0.274
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
0.32
0.32
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
0.079
0.079
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
0.204
0.204
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
0.488
0.488
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 600 PA
47.65
56.28
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Ed Madjeski and Jim Smith
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 9 Innings
134
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 9 Innings
580
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Ed Madjeski
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.99
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100