Forest Maddox vs. Jim Smith — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jim Smith posted the stronger offensive profile against Forest Maddox. Jim Smith posted stronger numbers in OPS (1.167 vs .423) and on-base percentage (.500 vs .235). By the career numbers, Jim Smith had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Forest Maddox and Jim Smith
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.125
1.125
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.7
22.06
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.12
167.55
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.235
0.235
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.188
0.188
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.667
0.667
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.153
0.153
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.392
0.392
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.308
0.308
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
1.5
1.5
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 600 PA
0.89
28.12
Jim Smith
Career
Per 600 PA
0.9
135.7
Fielding Stats for Forest Maddox and Jim Smith
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 9 Innings
7
1.62
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
1.15
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1.13
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
2.77
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
2.77
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5.63
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.714
1.714
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Forest Maddox
Career
Per 9 Innings
71.43
71.43
Jim Smith
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100