Earle Mack vs. James White — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, James White posted the stronger offensive profile against Earle Mack. James White posted stronger numbers in OPS (.527 vs .375) and on-base percentage (.241 vs .125). By the career numbers, James White had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Earle Mack and James White
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
0.214
0.214
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
0.535
0.535
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
0.333
0.333
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
0.241
0.241
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
0.071
0.071
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
0.18
0.18
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
0.409
0.409
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
1.98
40.92
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
James White
Career
Per 600 PA
Fielding Stats for Earle Mack and James White
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
James White
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.13
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
James White
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
1.13
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
James White
Career
Per 9 Innings
28
3.94
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
James White
Career
Per 9 Innings
27
3.8
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
James White
Career
Per 9 Innings
96.43
96.43
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
James White
Career
Per 9 Innings
3.375
3.375
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
20
James White
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100