Earle Mack vs. Tom Ryder — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Tom Ryder posted the stronger offensive profile against Earle Mack. Tom Ryder posted stronger numbers in OPS (.586 vs .375) and on-base percentage (.300 vs .125). By the career numbers, Tom Ryder had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Earle Mack and Tom Ryder
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
0.6
0.6
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
0.143
0.143
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
0.3
0.3
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
0.286
0.286
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
0.036
0.036
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
0.206
0.206
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
0.476
0.476
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 600 PA
2.93
58.62
Fielding Stats for Earle Mack and Tom Ryder
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 9 Innings
8
0.95
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
1.54
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 9 Innings
65
65
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Tom Ryder
Career
Per 9 Innings
1.625
1.625