Earle Mack vs. Nate Rolison — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earle Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against Nate Rolison. Earle Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.375 vs .202) and slugging (.250 vs .077). By the career numbers, Earle Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Earle Mack and Nate Rolison
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.077
0.077
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.344
0.344
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.077
0.077
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.076
0.076
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 600 PA
0.167
0.167
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 600 PA
4
4
Fielding Stats for Earle Mack and Nate Rolison
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 9 Innings
4
1.57
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 9 Innings
3
1.17
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 9 Innings
23
9
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 9 Innings
5.75
5.75
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
20
Nate Rolison
Career
Per 9 Innings
75
75