Earle Mack vs. Jimmie Reese — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Jimmie Reese posted the stronger offensive profile against Earle Mack. Jimmie Reese posted stronger numbers in OPS (.697 vs .375) and on-base percentage (.324 vs .125). By the career numbers, Jimmie Reese had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Earle Mack and Jimmie Reese
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5
187.5
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
232
173.78
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
801
600
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.278
0.278
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.712
0.712
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.5
0.5
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.248
0.248
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.59
22.05
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
91.57
68.59
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.324
0.324
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.373
0.373
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.096
0.096
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.239
0.239
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
0.62
0.62
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
1
37.5
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
185
138.58
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
101.48
76.02
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
21.65
21.65
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
1
37.5
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
11
8.24
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
100
100
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 600 PA
63.64
63.64
Fielding Stats for Earle Mack and Jimmie Reese
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 9 Innings
191
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 9 Innings
968
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Jimmie Reese
Career
Per 9 Innings
97.58