Earle Mack vs. Joe Redfield — Career Comparison
On the career numbers, Earle Mack posted the stronger offensive profile against Joe Redfield. Earle Mack posted stronger numbers in OPS (.375 vs .350) and slugging (.250 vs .100). Joe Redfield had the advantage in on-base percentage (.250 vs .125). By the career numbers, Earle Mack had the stronger overall case — though those totals don't account for the eras and run environments each player worked in.
Hitting Stats for Earle Mack and Joe Redfield
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
16
600
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
25
600
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.1
0.1
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.429
0.429
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.423
0.423
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.125
0.125
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.25
0.25
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.119
0.119
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.138
0.138
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.357
0.357
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.316
0.316
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
0.37
13.84
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
0.35
8.51
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
5.33
5.33
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
25
25
Earle Mack
Career
Per 600 PA
1
37.5
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 600 PA
1
24
Fielding Stats for Earle Mack and Joe Redfield
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
5
5
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
10
1.67
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
1
1
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
6
1
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
13
2.17
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
25
25
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
12
2
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
100
100
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
92.31
92.31
Earle Mack
Career
Per 9 Innings
20
20
Joe Redfield
Career
Per 9 Innings
60
60